Wednesday, August 14, 2019

Spring, 2025 Syllabi (scroll down to desired syllabus)


Logic & Critical Reasoning

Spring 2025

MWF 10 & 11 (sections 01 & 02)

Bowman 206

Professor:            Dr. David K. Braden-Johnson                      

Department:       English & Philosophy

Office:                  Office #109, 60 Porter Street

Office Hours:     MW 3:15-4:15; F 2-3

Email:                  d.johnson@mcla.edu

Blog:                     http://www.critojazz.blogspot.com

 

Online Text:   Matthew Van Cleeve, Introduction to Logic and Critical Reasoning

Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking - Open Textbook Library

Focus of Course

This course is designed to improve your ability to understand, construct, and criticize both informal (natural language) and formal (categorical and propositional) "arguments" or claims presented as reasons for accepting some further claim.  Our every effort to communicate (including our efforts to teach and learn) involves the use (and, quite frequently, misuse) of logical argumentation.  Consider, for example, the following syllogism (an argument consisting of three statements (two premises and one conclusion) relating three terms (nothing, logic, and eternal happiness):

Nothing is better than finding eternal happiness.

Taking a course in logic is better than nothing.

 Therefore, taking a course in logic is better than finding eternal happiness!

The argument has a superficially valid form (a>b, c>a, therefore, c>b) which produces a rather unbelievable result.  It is clear that something in our reasoning has gone wrong -- but what exactly?  (It turns out that the premises equivocate on the meaning of the two phrases "better than nothing" and "nothing is better than.")  Our most general task is to avoid all such logical mistakes (especially in more serious contexts).  To this end we will consider in some detail the very notion of argument, argument structure, and the criteria for constructing good arguments; distinguish arguments supported by evidence and reason from mere opinion or belief; learn about a constructive form of induction and the limits of deduction; assess the nature and scope of “critical thinking”; and, most generally, apply these logical concepts to our writing, thinking, and acting.

I assume as well that our primary, collaborative task is to provide an inclusive and effective environment for learning -- one that promotes careful, thoughtful, and critical thinking.

In my view, critical thinking is the educational counterpart of rationality:  A critical thinker is one who appreciates (has the correct emotional and dispositional response to) and accepts the importance, the convicting force, of reasons; one who, when assessing claims, making judgments, or contemplating alternative actions, seeks reasons on which to base those assessments, judgments, and actions.  {There are, of course, other, marginally different yet often compelling, interpretations of critical thinking.)  We will frequently supplement our philosophical discussions with a consideration of the nature and value of teaching and learning.  In fact, we may spend as much time discussing the general topics of pedagogy (theories of teaching and learning) and critical thinking as we devote to the more traditional concerns of logic. 

Online Activities

In addition to assignments posted to Canvas, my blog listed above contains links to all ancillary University services, course handouts, and assignments, including a noninteractive page that lists weekly assignments for this course (“Assignments: Logic and CR”).  Since I prefer to devote class-time to the exposition and analysis of student and textual positions, I typically reserve my own views for this online medium.

Class Policies and Expectations

Carefully review Handout CPE.

Cancellations. I will attempt to email the entire class to warn of any unanticipated cancellations.

Laptop Policy

Like a concert hall or theater, our classroom is reserved for face-to-face interaction. Thus, barring special needs or circumstances, you may bring but not use your laptop during class. The same policy applies to cell phones and all other distracting gadgets. Please print out in advance any electronic material required for class.

Examinations

There will be several exams, most likely 4, spaced roughly evenly throughout the semester.  They will be modeled after the exercises of the text and designed to test your attendance and note-taking skills, basic grasp of the issues, ability to study for cumulative exams, and attention to the details of all reading assignments and problem sets.

My grading policy is, therefore, transparent and simple, based solely on the scores of your exams (See Handout CPE, “grading”).

 -----------------------------

Art and Philosophy

Spring, 2025

MWF 1-1:50

Murdoch 213

Professor:             David K. Braden-Johnson                       

Department:        English and Philosophy

Office:                   Office #109, 60 Porter Street

Office Hours:      MW 3:30-4:30; F 2-3; and by appt.

Email:                   d.johnson@mcla.edu

Blog:                      http://www.critojazz.blogspot.com

Required Text:   Aesthetics, Cahn and Meskin, eds. (In MCLA Bookstore)

Focus of Class

This is an introductory yet rigorous seminar in the philosophy of art (often called “aesthetics”).  In the context of a philosophical (essentially theoretical, rather than a more narrowly historical, psychological, or sociological, etc.) approach to the products and processes of human artistic efforts, this course surveys and employs a variety of traditional and contemporary concepts for describing accurately our experience, understanding, and appreciation of all forms of art.

 Our philosophical inquiries will engage two central questions of aesthetics: “What is art/the aesthetic -- can it be clearly defined?” and “What is the source of art’s unique value to humans?”  We will also take up several related, domain-specific, or applied questions such as:

 What are the significant connections between artists and their audiences, society, history, politics, and the so-called “art-world”?  What is the nature of artistic innovation, creativity, and interpretation?  How are emotions/feelings, knowledge, truth, morality, taste, beauty, experience, and interpretation related to the arts? What is the nature of modern, or conceptual, art?  Is music a type of language?

Online Activities

My blog listed above contains links to all supporting course handouts (DKBJs Handouts) and assignments, including a non-interactive page that lists weekly reading assignments for this course (Assignments: Art and Philosophy). I will also post each assignment to Canvas.

Class Policies and Expectations

Carefully review Handout CPE

Cancellations

I will attempt to email the entire class to warn of any unanticipated cancellations.

Laptop Policy

Like a concert hall or theater, our classroom is reserved for face-to-face interaction. Thus, barring special needs or circumstances, you may bring but not use your laptop during class. The same policy applies to cell phones, IPods, and all other distracting gadgets. Please print out in advance any material required for class.

Exams

Every two or three weeks, students will assist in composing and then complete in class short exams covering the content of all discussions and readings.  

My grading policy is transparent and simple, based solely on the scores of your exams. (See Handout CPE,“grading”).

------------------------------------

Contemporary Moral Issues

Spring 2025

MW 2-3:15

Murdoch 213

Professor:            David K. Braden-Johnson                      

Department:       English & Philosophy

Office:                  Office #109, 60 Porter Street

Office Hours:      MW 3:15-4:15; F 2-3

Email:                  d.johnson@mcla.edu

Blog:                     http://www.critojazz.blogspot.com

Required TextContemporary Debates in Applied Ethics, Cohen and Wellman, Eds., 2014

Focus of Class

This is an upper-division philosophy elective in applied ethics – the self-consciously concrete and worldly application of normative (evaluative, moral) thought and language to human affairs.  We will briefly examine the nature of ethical language and thought (so-called “meta-ethics”), the challenge of relativistic ethics, and competing ethical principles and theories (virtue theory, deontological and consequentialist/teleological theories, etc.) before considering in detail a variety of moral dilemmas involving the infliction of serious harm or death on sentient beings (humans included), such as capital punishment, abortion, animal use/abuse, euthanasia, just war theory and pacifism, torture, paternalism and vaccination, affirmative action,, suicide, etc.

Online Activities

In addition to assignments posted to Canvas, my blog listed above contains links to all ancillary University services, course handouts, and assignments, including an interactive page that lists weekly assignments for this course (“Assignments: CMI”).  Since I prefer to devote class-time to the exposition and analysis of student and textual positions, I typically reserve my own views for this online medium.

Class Policies and Expectations

Carefully review Handout CPE.

Cancellations

I will attempt to email the entire class to warn of any unanticipated cancellations.

Laptop Policy

Like a concert hall or theater, our classroom is reserved for face-to-face interaction. Thus, barring special needs or circumstances, you may bring but not use your laptop during class. The same policy applies to cell phones and all other distracting gadgets. Please print out in advance any electronic material required for class. 

Examinations

There will be no examinations in this course.

Book Review

See Handout BR

Multi-Stage Critical Research Essay

See Handout M-SCRE

 

Friday, January 18, 2019

Handout QA: Q&As (nonhonors/100-200-level sections)

What is a Q&A?
A Q&A is a brief writing assignment that asks each student to answer one question (typically posed by the professor) and to raise two further questions about a particular subject.  Typically, Q&As are posted by Friday evening in the margin of my main weblog on the "assignments" page corresponding to the course and due the following Friday in hard copy at the close of class.

Why write a Q&A?
(1) Q&As encourage critical, careful, deliberate reading of texts — readings which begin with thorough exposition and end with critical interpretation; (2) Q&As create a more permanent (written) record of the reader's reflections on a text and its author's (apparent) intentions; (3) Q&As, qua a literary form, allow students to practice and perfect their own artistic products; and (4) Q&As can promote and assist classroom discussion of texts.

How does one successfully complete a Q&A?
A complete Q&A consists of these two parts:

1. Each student produces a 250-500-word (one-to-two full double-spaced pages) answer to the question I pose.  Answers should be typed and free of grammatical/stylistic errors.  All answers must take the form of argumentative (or "critical" or "persuasive") essays.  I've outlined the format for composing these essays in Handouts ST, CR1, CR2, and CR3.  You are not required to include a "CRITO outline" (see handout CR3) with your final essay.  Properly cite all quoted or paraphrased material.  Any established style is acceptable (MLA, APA, etc.)  My only concern is that the method you choose is consistent, complete, and accurate.

2. Each student then composes two well-formed and thoughtful questions related to the topic at hand, avoiding rhetorical ("who's to say what is really true?") or simple (when was Kant born?) questions in favor of substantive issues of genuine concern to the student.  It is not necessary to answer the questions you raise.  Simply number the questions "1" and "2" and position them at the bottom of your essay.

How are Q&As graded?
Each student will receive a grade of "check minus minus," “check minus,” “check,” or “check plus,” corresponding to the letter grades D, C, B, and A.  Although grading is a fallible affair, in general most Q&As will receive a “check” or "check minus" unless obviously deficient or exemplary in some respect. In full-semester (15 week) courses, students are allowed one unexcused missed Q&A and one unexcused missed quiz. (Unexcused) late work receives no credit at all.  For an explanation of any abbreviations included in my marginal commentary on your work, consult my "Editorial Suggestions Key."

Note well: Q&As and quizzes are the only graded components of the course, so missing an assignment/quiz or two beyond the two allowable typically leads to failure.  I collect hard copies of papers on the due date at the close of class.  Aside from fully online courses, I do not accept papers in electronic form.